datingtips biz - Dating the book of daniel

The inscriptions had been written at the command of Nabonidus, king of Babylon 555–539 B. Many of the charges of so-called historical inaccuracies in Daniel result from the lack of hard archaeological evidence in which to ground Daniel’s historical statements.

dating the book of daniel-5dating the book of daniel-37dating the book of daniel-77

Dating the book of daniel

Daniel held high offices in both the Neo-Babylonian and the Medo-Persian Empire.

These empires were multiethnic in nature; Daniel’s positions would almost certainly have required at least some grasp or appreciation of languages.

the triumph of Greece)."Though these dreams and visions all concern events in the future, there is considerable variation both in the timescale involved and in the scope of the events predicted. ""Quite apart from the historicity of the figure of Daniel, the authenticity of the book had already been questioned by the 3d century Neoplatonist philosopher Porphyry.

Some dreams predict events for the immediate future, some for the more distant future, and some for the very distant future. According to the relation of his opinions by Jerome (who spent much of his commentary on Daniel refuting Porphyry's arguments), Porphyry contended that the remarkably accurate "predictions" contained in Daniel (esp. 11) were the result of a pious fraud, perpetrated by some zealous propagandist of the Maccabean movement, who wished to encourage a spirit of heroism among the Jewish patriots resisting Antiochus IV. We are informed by Jerome that: "Porphyry wrote his twelfth book against the prophecy of Daniel, denying that it was composed by the person to whom it is ascribed in its title, but rather by some individual living in Judaea at the time of that Antiochus who was surnamed Epiphanes; he further alleged that 'Daniel' did not foretell the future so much as he related the past, and lastly that whatever he spoke of up till the time of Antiochus contained authentic history, whereas anything he may have conjectured beyond that point was false, inasmuch as he would not have foreknown the future.""As to the date of the composition of Daniel, the narrative of the prophet's earliest experiences begins with his capture as a hostage by Nebuchadnezzar back in 605-604 B. and according to continues certainly till the first year of Cyrus (c. C.), in relation to his public service, and to the third year of Cyrus (535 B.

We need to remember, though, that archaeology is an incomplete record, an ongoing process. A mere lack of evidence from archaeology today does not prove that an event described in the Bible never happened.

Many ancient sites have been destroyed by events such as wars, earthquakes and volcanic eruptions.

Generations of us have been educated in a society that has accepted rationalism as the basis of all its education, literally as a religion in itself.

The concept of a real God who controls history and tells men and women how they ought to live is unacceptable to most. He wrote a work titled , in which he denounced the book of Daniel as a fake written in the Maccabean period (167–134 B. To this day critics follow the lead of Porphyry and question the book’s validity on two key points: first, that it is historically inaccurate; and second, that its prophecies were written Was the book of Daniel inspired by God, or is it, in the words of one writer, nothing more than “a happy hunting ground for religious cranks?

The first recorded critic of Daniel was Porphyry, a third-century A. ” In 1850 a German commentary claimed that the name of King Belshazzar was not to be found outside the book of Daniel and that this king of Babylon was just a figment of the author’s imagination.

Four years later, in 1854, a British consul in Iraq was excavating the ancient ruins of a tower on behalf of the British Museum. The words they carried proved that the ruined tower was the temple of the city of Ur.

We don't even have to show that the book was in its current form at all-if we can even find references or close/obvious allusions to the images/languages in Daniel, we will have ante-dated the events, and hence, have encountered 'real' prophecy.

Tags: , ,